Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 6 HP less power than Toyota C-HR, but torque is 128 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Despite less power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 3.9 | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-30 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-30 has 53 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`949 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |