Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Seat Ateca 2020

 
Mazda CX-30
2019 - 2021
Seat Ateca
2020 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 116 HP150 HP
Torque: 270 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds8.8 seconds
Seat Ateca is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda CX-30 engine produces 34 HP less power than Seat Ateca, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Seat Ateca. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.45.7
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-30 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway1210 km on highway
Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.38 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.56 m1.62 m
Mazda CX-30 is 1 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres510 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1406 litres1604 litres
Seat Ateca has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Ateca (by 198 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Seat Ateca, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`949 kg1`990 kg
Net weight:1`344 kg1`408 kg
Load capacity:605 kg582 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 20 60020 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-30 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Seat Ateca has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv