Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Mazda CX-5 2018

 
Mazda CX-30
2019 - 2021
Mazda CX-5
2018 - 2021
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 116 HP150 HP
Torque: 270 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds10.7 seconds
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda CX-30 engine produces 34 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.45.5
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-30 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres56 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway1090 km on highway
Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.55 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.56 m1.68 m
Mazda CX-30 is smaller.
Mazda CX-30 is 16 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres494 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1406 litres1608 litres
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space.
Mazda CX-30 has 64 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 202 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`949 kg2`143 kg
Net weight:1`344 kg1`611 kg
Load capacity:605 kg532 kg
Mazda CX-30 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Mazda CX-30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 21 20021 800
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-30 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Mazda CX-5 has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv