Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-30 engine produces 1 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Despite the higher power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.4 | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-30 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Karoq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mazda CX-30 is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-30 has 91 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Mazda CX-30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 224 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`969 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |