Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Nissan Qashqai 2019
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 34 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 65 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Nissan Qashqai 2017: Nissan ALL-MODE 4x4 all-wheel drive system automatically distributes torque between the axles from 100 percent to the front wheels to a 50/50 ratio depending on road conditions, ensuring safe and precise handling. | |||
Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.60 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1598 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`969 | 2`110 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 21 800 | 14 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |