Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 59 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.8 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2017: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 16 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-30 has 76 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 214 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`969 | 2`143 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |