Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 240 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 500 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 124 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 230 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.2 | |
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.65 m | |
Mazda CX-30 is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 591 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | no data | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-30 has 161 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Mazda CX-30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`969 | 1`880 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 400 | 34 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |