Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Kia XCeed 2019
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
Kia XCeed is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 20 HP less power than Kia XCeed, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Kia XCeed. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.4 | |
The Kia XCeed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia XCeed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-30 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
1060 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
Kia XCeed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.48 m | |
Mazda CX-30 and Kia XCeed are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1332 litres | |
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-30 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Kia XCeed. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 74 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia XCeed, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`969 | 1`950 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 400 | 21 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Kia XCeed has
| |