Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 47 HP less power than Jaguar E-Pace, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Jaguar E-Pace. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 65 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 601 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1386 litres | |
| Mazda CX-30 has 171 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`969 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |