Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Honda HR-V 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Mazda CX-30 engine produces 24 HP less power than Honda HR-V, but torque is 98 NM more than Honda HR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 8.1 | |
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
1060 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
Mazda CX-30 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-30 is 10 cm longer than the Honda HR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 431 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1456 litres | |
Mazda CX-30 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 50 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`969 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 400 | 17 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |