Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-30 engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, but torque is 17 NM more than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.9 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-5 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 16 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1406 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-30 has 47 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 214 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Mazda CX-30 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`957 kg | 2`025 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`347 kg | 1`559 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 610 kg | 466 kg | |
| Mazda CX-30 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Mazda CX-30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |