Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Honda HR-V 2015

 
Mazda CX-30
2019 -
Honda HR-V
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP140 HP
Torque: 213 NM172 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 secondsn/a seconds
Mazda CX-30 engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Honda HR-V.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.68.1
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-30 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
1080 km on highway660 km on highway
Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 175 mm (6.9 inches)170 mm (6.7 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.30 m
Width: 1.80 m1.77 m
Height: 1.56 m1.61 m
Mazda CX-30 is larger, but lower.
Mazda CX-30 is 10 cm longer than the Honda HR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres431 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1406 litres1456 litres
Mazda CX-30 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 50 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Mazda CX-30 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`957no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 21 80016 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-30 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Honda HR-V has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv