Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Mazda CX-5 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-30 engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 7.2 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 16 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-30 has 76 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 214 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Mazda CX-30 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`995 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |