Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 186 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-30 engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Despite the higher power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 43 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-30 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-30 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-30 has 53 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |