Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Honda HR-V 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-30 engine produces 19 HP less power than Honda HR-V, but torque is 41 NM more than Honda HR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 8.4 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-30 is 10 cm longer than the Honda HR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 431 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1456 litres | |
| Mazda CX-30 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`927 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |