Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 189 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-30 engine produces 28 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 24 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.5 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2017: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 19 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1110 litres | |
| Mazda CX-30 has 67 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 296 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`957 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |