Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 68 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 107 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.9 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mazda CX-30 is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1406 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 224 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`957 kg | 2`213 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`347 kg | 1`480 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 610 kg | 733 kg | |
| Mazda CX-30 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Skoda Karoq. Therefore, Skoda Karoq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |