Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Kia XCeed 2019
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 200 HP | |
Torque: | 213 NM | 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
Kia XCeed is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 78 HP less power than Kia XCeed, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Kia XCeed. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.1 | |
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia XCeed, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
1060 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.50 m | |
Mazda CX-30 and Kia XCeed are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 426 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | no data | |
Mazda CX-30 has 4 litres more trunk space than the Kia XCeed. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia XCeed, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`957 | 1`880 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 000 | 21 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Kia XCeed has
| |