Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2017

 
Mazda CX-30
2019 - 2021
Skoda Karoq
2017 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 122 HP150 HP
Torque: 213 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.1 seconds8.4 seconds
Skoda Karoq is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda CX-30 engine produces 28 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.35.1
Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-30 could require 30 litres more fuel.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ...  More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.38 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.56 m1.61 m
Mazda CX-30 is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres521 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1406 litresno data
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-30 has 91 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Mazda CX-30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.4 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`995no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 23 40023 000
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-30 has
  • has 4x4 drive
Skoda Karoq has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv