Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 213 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 41 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.8 | |
Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-30 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.59 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1585 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`021 | 1`900 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 22 200 | 17 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |