Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 17 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, but torque is 16 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.8 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-30 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda CX-30 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |