Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Mazda CX-5 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 7.2 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2017: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 16 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-30 has 76 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 214 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |