Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Kia XCeed 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Kia XCeed is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 24 HP less power than Kia XCeed, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Kia XCeed. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 6.9 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia XCeed, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 250'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-30 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia XCeed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda CX-30 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.50 m | |
| Mazda CX-30 and Kia XCeed are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 426 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | no data | |
| Mazda CX-30 has 4 litres more trunk space than the Kia XCeed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia XCeed, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Kia XCeed has
| |