Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Volvo XC40 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 224 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
Volvo XC40 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 10 HP less power than Volvo XC40, whereas torque is 76 NM less than Volvo XC40. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.9 | |
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC40, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
1100 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.65 m | |
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo XC40, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | no data | |
Volvo XC40 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-30 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC40. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 2`220 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 400 | 24 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Volvo XC40 has
| |