Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Volvo XC40 2017

 
Mazda CX-30
2019 - 2021
Volvo XC40
2017 - 2020
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 180 HP190 HP
Torque: 224 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds8.4 seconds
Volvo XC40 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda CX-30 engine produces 10 HP less power than Volvo XC40, whereas torque is 76 NM less than Volvo XC40. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.26.9
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-30 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC40, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
1100 km on highway930 km on highway
Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.43 m
Width: 1.80 m1.86 m
Height: 1.56 m1.65 m
Mazda CX-30 is smaller.
Mazda CX-30 is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo XC40, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1406 litresno data
Volvo XC40 has more luggage space.
Mazda CX-30 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC40.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9652`220
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 23 40024 200
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-30 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volvo XC40 has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv