Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 30 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, but torque is 26 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.63 m | |
| Mazda CX-30 is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-30 has 91 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Mazda CX-30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 224 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |