Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 63 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.1 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda CX-30 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.64 m | |
| Mazda CX-30 is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1206 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-30 has 46 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 200 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |