Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Kia XCeed 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 44 HP more power than Kia XCeed, but torque is 96 NM less than Kia XCeed. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.4 | |
|
The Kia XCeed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia XCeed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-30 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Kia XCeed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i30, Kia Optima | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia XCeed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mazda CX-30 and Kia XCeed are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1332 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-30 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Kia XCeed. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 74 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia XCeed, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Kia XCeed has
| |