Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Cupra Ateca 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 4.9 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 120 HP less power than Cupra Ateca, whereas torque is 176 NM less than Cupra Ateca. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.6 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Cupra Ateca, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-30 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-30 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mazda CX-30 and Cupra Ateca are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | no data | |
|
Cupra Ateca has more luggage space. Mazda CX-30 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Cupra Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Cupra Ateca, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 31 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Cupra Ateca has
| |