Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Audi Q3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 30 HP more power than Audi Q3, but torque is 26 NM less than Audi Q3. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.9 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi Q3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi Q3 2018 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Audi Q3 2018 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 9 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1525 litres | |
|
Audi Q3 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-30 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q3 (by 119 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Mazda CX-30 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 32 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |