Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Jeep Compass 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda CX-30) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Jeep Compass) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 10 HP more power than Jeep Compass, but torque is 156 NM less than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.7 | |
| Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Compass gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Compass can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.64 m | |
| Mazda CX-30 and Jeep Compass are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Mazda CX-30 has 28 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |