Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 189 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-30 engine produces 1 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Skoda Karoq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.9 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mazda CX-30 is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1406 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 224 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`939 kg | 2`213 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`462 kg | 1`480 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 477 kg | 733 kg | |
| Mazda CX-30 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 54 procentiem less than Skoda Karoq. Therefore, Skoda Karoq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |