Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2019

 
Mazda CX-30
2019 -
Skoda Karoq
2019 - 2021
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 189 HP190 HP
Torque: 252 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7.3 seconds
Mazda CX-30 engine produces 1 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Skoda Karoq.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.9
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 790 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 175 mm (6.9 inches)176 mm (6.9 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.38 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.56 m1.61 m
Mazda CX-30 is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres521 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1406 litres1630 litres
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-30 has 91 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Mazda CX-30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 224 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9392`213
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 22 00018 800
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-30 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Skoda Karoq has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv