Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda CX-30) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Karoq) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 189 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-30 engine produces 39 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, but torque is 88 NM less than Skoda Karoq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mazda CX-30 is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-30 has 91 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Mazda CX-30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`939 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 22 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |