Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 189 HP | 116 - 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 - 270 NM | 142 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | 8.2 - 11.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.4 | 3.9 - 6.9 | |
|
Mazda CX-30 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota C-HR. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-30 has 53 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`986 | ~ 1`898 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |