Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 - 189 HP | 115 - 190 HP | |
Torque: | 213 - 270 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | 7.8 - 10.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.4 | 4.5 - 5.3 | |
Mazda CX-30 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Karoq. On average, Mazda CX-30 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
Mazda CX-30 is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 521 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | no data | |
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-30 has 91 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Mazda CX-30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`986 | ~ 1`940 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 400 | 23 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |