Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2017

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda CX-30
2019 -
Skoda Karoq
2017 - 2021
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.0 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 116 - 189 HP115 - 190 HP
Torque: 213 - 270 NM200 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 - 12.6 seconds7.3 - 10.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 6.44.4 - 6.9
Mazda CX-30 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Karoq. On average, Mazda CX-30 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 175 - 180 mm (6.9 - 7.1 inches)176 mm (6.9 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.38 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.56 m1.61 m
Mazda CX-30 is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres521 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1406 litres1630 litres
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-30 has 91 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Mazda CX-30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 224 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`986~ 1`980
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 22 00018 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-30 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Skoda Karoq has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv