Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2017

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda CX-30
2019 -
Skoda Karoq
2017 -
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.0 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 116 - 189 HP115 - 190 HP
Torque: 213 - 270 NM200 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 - 12.6 seconds7.8 - 10.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 6.44.5 - 5.3
Mazda CX-30 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Karoq. On average, Mazda CX-30 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.38 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.56 m1.61 m
Mazda CX-30 is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres521 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1406 litresno data
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-30 has 91 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Mazda CX-30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.4 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`986~ 1`940
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 23 40023 200
Pros and Cons:
    Skoda Karoq has
    • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
    • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv