Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 189 HP | 150 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 - 270 NM | 249 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | 9.3 - 10.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.4 | 6.6 - 8.7 | |
|
Mazda CX-30 petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 175 - 180 mm (6.9 - 7.1 inches) | 183 - 216 mm (7.2 - 8.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 640 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1385 litres | |
| Mazda CX-30 has 210 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 21 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`986 | ~ 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has
| |