Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Jeep Compass 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 - 189 HP | 120 - 170 HP | |
Torque: | 213 - 270 NM | 230 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | 9.3 - 10.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.4 | 4.4 - 6.9 | |
Mazda CX-30 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Compass. On average, Mazda CX-30 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 175 - 180 mm (6.9 - 7.1 inches) | 198 - 215 mm (7.8 - 8.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Compass can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.64 m | |
Mazda CX-30 and Jeep Compass are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 458 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | no data | |
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Mazda CX-30 has 28 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`986 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 400 | 25 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |