Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Jeep Compass 2017

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda CX-30
2019 -
Jeep Compass
2017 - 2020
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 116 - 189 HP120 - 170 HP
Torque: 213 - 270 NM230 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 - 12.6 seconds9.3 - 10.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 6.44.4 - 6.9
Mazda CX-30 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Compass. On average, Mazda CX-30 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 175 - 180 mm (6.9 - 7.1 inches)198 - 215 mm (7.8 - 8.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Compass can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.39 m
Width: 1.80 m1.82 m
Height: 1.56 m1.64 m
Mazda CX-30 and Jeep Compass are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres458 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1406 litresno data
Jeep Compass has more luggage space.
Mazda CX-30 has 28 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`986no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 21 80028 000
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-30 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Jeep Compass has
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv