Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2020

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda CX-30
2019 -
Jaguar E-Pace
2020 -
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid)

Performance

Power: 116 - 189 HP160 - 300 HP
Torque: 213 - 270 NM260 - 430 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 - 12.6 seconds6.5 - 10.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 6.4no data
Ground clearance: 175 - 180 mm (6.9 - 7.1 inches)212 mm (8.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.40 m
Width: 1.80 mno data
Height: 1.56 m1.65 m
Trunk capacity: 430 litres601 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1406 litres1386 litres
Mazda CX-30 has 171 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 20 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Jaguar E-Pace, which means Mazda CX-30 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`986~ 2`670
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 23 40026 400
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-30 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Jaguar E-Pace has
  • petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv