Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2020
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 - 189 HP | 160 - 300 HP | |
Torque: | 213 - 270 NM | 260 - 430 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | 6.5 - 10.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.4 | no data | |
Ground clearance: | 175 - 180 mm (6.9 - 7.1 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | no data | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.65 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 601 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1386 litres | |
Mazda CX-30 has 171 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 20 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Jaguar E-Pace, which means Mazda CX-30 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`986 | ~ 2`670 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 400 | 26 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |