Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Honda HR-V 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 189 HP | 120 - 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 - 270 NM | 155 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | 10.1 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.4 | 4.0 - 8.4 | |
|
Mazda CX-30 petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda HR-V. On average, Mazda CX-30 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 175 - 180 mm (6.9 - 7.1 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-30 is 10 cm longer than the Honda HR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 431 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1456 litres | |
| Mazda CX-30 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`986 | ~ 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |