Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Peugeot 2008 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 13 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 3.6 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 400'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Citroen Berlingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 434 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1467 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 84 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 207 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`755 | 1`731 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |