Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Opel Mokka 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 21 HP less power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Opel Mokka. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mazda CX-3 and Opel Mokka are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1260 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`823 kg | 1`938 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`360 kg | 1`429 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 463 kg | 509 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Mokka has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |