Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Peugeot 2008 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mazda CX-3) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Peugeot 2008) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 15 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Despite the higher power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.5 | |
| Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1467 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 207 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |