Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Opel Crossland 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 5 HP less power than Opel Crossland, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Opel Crossland. Despite less power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.4 | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Opel Crossland gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Crossland engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Insignia, Citroen C4 Cactus, Citroen C3 Aircross | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Crossland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.61 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1260 litres | 1255 litres | |
| Mazda CX-3 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Opel Crossland. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Crossland, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`780 kg | 1`855 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`261 kg | 1`286 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 519 kg | 569 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Opel Crossland has
| |