Mazda CX-3 2018 vs BMW X2 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 75 HP less power than BMW X2, whereas torque is 130 NM less than BMW X2. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.8 | |
| Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| BMW X2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X2 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda CX-3 is 9 cm shorter than the BMW X2, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1355 litres | |
|
BMW X2 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 120 litres less trunk space than the BMW X2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X2 (by 95 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.7 metres less than that of the BMW X2, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
BMW X2 has
| |