Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 207 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 69 HP less power than Volkswagen T-Roc, whereas torque is 113 NM less than Volkswagen T-Roc. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.57 m | |
| Mazda CX-3 is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1237 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-3 has 95 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Roc. This could mean that the Mazda CX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 23 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`692 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-3 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |