Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Suzuki Vitara 2018

 
Mazda CX-3
2018 -
Suzuki Vitara
2018 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 121 HP117 HP
Torque: 207 NM151 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds11.5 seconds
Mazda CX-3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda CX-3 engine produces 4 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 56 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.25.8
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 48 litres47 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway920 km on highway
Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Suzuki Vitara 2018 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality. High engine timing chain lifetime. Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.18 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.54 m1.61 m
Mazda CX-3 is 10 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 350 litres375 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1260 litresno data
Suzuki Vitara has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-3 has 25 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. This could mean that the Mazda CX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6921`730
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

above average
Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Vitara has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 14 00018 400
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-3 has
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Suzuki Vitara has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv