Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 207 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 29 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Despite less power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-5 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 28 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 153 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 360 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`692 | 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |