Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Peugeot 2008 2019

 
Mazda CX-3
2018 -
Peugeot 2008
2019 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 121 HP130 HP
Torque: 207 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds9.3 seconds
Peugeot 2008 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda CX-3 engine produces 9 HP less power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 93 NM less than Peugeot 2008. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.13.8
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-3 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 345 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 48 litres41 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway1170 km on highway
Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.30 m
Width: 1.77 m1.77 m
Height: 1.54 m1.53 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 350 litres434 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1260 litres1467 litres
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space.
Mazda CX-3 has 84 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 207 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7271`770
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

below average
Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 18 60020 400
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-3 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Peugeot 2008 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv