Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 207 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 29 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 10 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Despite less power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 7.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-3 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 9 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1206 litres | |
| Mazda CX-3 has 34 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 54 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`727 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |