Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 207 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 59 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Mazda CX-30. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.6 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-30, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1406 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 146 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`727 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |