Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Peugeot 2008 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 18 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, but torque is 105 NM less than Peugeot 2008. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 3.8 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-3 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 434 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1467 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 194 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 207 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`762 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |